this particular case is another reminder of how important it is for folks to check their own insurance policies to make sure they have enough of what we call “underinsured” and “uninsured” coverage.

We recently succeeded in getting a municipal court to grant what is called a “motion to suppress” in a DUI case.

We recently obtained a mild outcome for a parent-client who was initially charged with permitting an underage party at their home.

We are dealing with a number of divorce cases where getting the pension assets divided according to Ohio law is complicated and long.

We just helped our client resolve an insurance coverage suit where the client’s homeowner’s carrier refused to properly pay for a loss stemming from a broken pipe.

The ex-spouse of our client attempted to back out of a divorce decree by claiming that she did not understand the divorce decree deal she had made.

We successfully argued a personal injury “arbitration,” where a client won a $25,000 arbitration award

Our understanding of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, along with some fair and frank discussions with the United State Attorney’s Office, lead to this great conclusion.

We were able to identify the minute but important mistakes that the police officer made during the pull-over and arrest of the client.

We just resolved a large personal injury case where our clients had to file what is known as a “underinsured” claim against their own auto insurance company.  

We convinced the Court of Appeals that a probate trial court’s decision in a division of assets was an “abuse of discretion.”

The ex-wife had a change of heart on the divorce degree, and wanted the trial court to let her back out of the divorce decree.  

We proved to the Court that the police officer (a State Trooper) did not follow the proper protocol in doing the DUI investigation.  

We just resolved a long-standing and large real estate lawsuit which involved years of motion practice and multiple lawsuits.

We recently resolved a divorce case where there was a very big issue regarding what was and what was not marital property.