We are currently handling a federal criminal case involving some really unique sentencing issues.

We are in the process of ongoing litigation between an insurance company and its insured (our client).

We recently won a long legal battle between two sisters who were competing for the same piece of residential real estate.

How do we treat people who are illegally allowed to vote and can be held accountable for any of their adult actions, but who are not legally permitted to ever possess or consume alcohol?

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we are running into a number of cases where magistrates or judges or a number of courts are issuing decisions and opinions based upon what would normally not be admissible in a in-person courtroom setting.

In this particular case, the defendant, because of the way federal sentencing laws technically read, may have to face a 15-year mandatory prison term for having a firearm in his car when he went out to get baby formula and food for his wife and kids.

We're still at war with the health insurance company that is attempting to grab a significant portion of a disabled and injured woman's personal injury proceeds.

We are currently defending a very serious alcohol related automobile accident case.

We just recently and successfully defended a client of ours who is accused of a bogus civil menacing by stalking complaint.

One of the things that COVID brought us in our practice was a remarkable increase in the use of video technology for court proceedings.

We are also happy to announce that we recently won a lawsuit involving a homeowner dispute between two sisters.

We are very happy to announce that we were able to successfully resolve a legal malpractice case.

In our criminal justice practice, we recently had two clients successfully get permission to enter what is called a diversion program.

We are able to show through some diagrams and some Google Earth photographs that our client may in fact have been in the right, despite having been ticketed by the Police Department.

In our civil litigation practice, we were successful in getting an Amish client’s lawsuit dismissed.

In our criminal justice practice, we were successful recently in two cases by getting our clients into what are called “diversion” programs.

We recently were able to conduct an entire federal motion to suppress by Zoom, and were able to present photos and documents to the witnesses from our laptop, while the witness was at a police station and the judge was in the courtroom.

We recently had a post-decree divorce case resolve on the day of the hearing – with the complete return of the parenting schedule that our client had sought for almost two years.

In our personal injury practice, we recently were able to turn a problematic serious automobile accident case around.

Michael O’Shea presented an oral argument to the Ohio Supreme Court on an issue of attorney discipline (we represent a lawyer who was charged with some disciplinary issues).